Re: SV: [wg-c] Deadlines

[Elisabeth PORTENEUVE <Elisabeth.PORTENEUVE@cetp.ipsl.fr>]

Petter Rindforth wrote:
> 
> Javier and all others, I fully agree that we have to set 
> a new deadline although I am not sure that September 7th 
> is enough. We will more likely need until September 30.
> 
> I am convinced that we will be able to present a report 
> by the end of September if only we could be a little more 
> organized in our discussions and stop jumping from subject 
> to subject, spending a lot of time with personal comments 
> on single participants in this working group. We are here 
> together, trying to solve some tricky problems and 
> to deliver a serious report/recommendation. Right?
> 
==> Petter,

    Thank you very much for reminding us that some organization
    is needed.
    It was suggested by somebody that Weekly Reports (synthesis,
    summary) are needed from Working Groups.
    Could somebody (2 persons ? 3 ?) from WG-C write a brief 
    report (adding, when necessary, URLs to some contributions 
    to this list, which is archived 
    on http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-c/Archives/)  ?
    Having that for the end of this week would be appreciated, then
    we could continue with weekly updates.

    Elisabeth Porteneuve

> Being an IP/IT Lawyer, a trademark owner and a domain name 
> holder, I wish to point out that we, the accused "TM people" 
> are not against the addition of new gTLDs as such, 
> what we say is: Be careful, go slow and make sure that 
> before creating any new problems there is a speedy and 
> effective dispute resolution process, a system for protecting 
> famous and well-known trademarks across all gTLDs and 
> an easy and cost-effective system for obtaining full 
> contact information. The addition of new gTLDs must be made 
> in a very controlled manner, and that's why it has to be 
> just a few to begin with.
> 
> // Petter Rindforth
> 
> 
> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> Från: Javier SOLA <javier@aui.es>
> Till: wg-c@dnso.org <wg-c@dnso.org>
> Datum: den 2 augusti 1999 19:41
> Ämne: [wg-c] Deadlines
> 
> 
> >
> >WG C,
> >
> >It is clear that we will have problems meeting our August 9th deadline for
> >the three reports that we are supposed to produce. We need to figure out
> >another deadline for the working group reports.
> >
> >At this point we are just starting the real discussion, and we should give
> >this at least a couple of weeks before we start drafting, and then at least
> >another couple of weeks for drafting and figuring out consensus on the
> >reports. I would propose that we set a new deadline for the beginning of
> >September.
> >
> >I would like to propose Tuesday September 7th.
> >
> >Any other ideas ?
> >
> >Javier
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
>