[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] Eureka?

To: "Kevin J. Connolly" <CONNOLLK@rspab.com>, <wg-c@dnso.org>, "Jonathan Weinberg" <weinberg@mail.msen.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
From: "Rod Dixon" <rod@cyberspaces.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 21:53:12 -0400
References: <3.0.3.32.19990804143431.05415d18@mail.msen.com>
Reply-To: "Rod Dixon" <rod@cyberspaces.org>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

I think something like Postel's 10/30 plan sounds about right.


Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
Visiting Assistant Professor of Law
Rutgers University School of Law - Camden
rod@cyberspaces.org
http://www.cyberspaces.org

>

References:
- Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
  - From: Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] trademark law & new gTLDs
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread