RE: [wg-c] Eureka?

["Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

I think that this pretty much will kill off the registry business and
leave it all to NSI and CORE. Frankly, under these rules, NSI would
probably bail out too. I have no earthly clue as to why CORE would
continence running a registry under these sorts of conditions.

The problems with this are obvious. They indicate the same myopia that
Karl Marx had a problem with. Thy ignore the human need for incentive.
What's the motivation...ego? ... prestige? Neither of them will pay the
rent, or even buy a cup of coffee.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-wg-c@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-c@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Kent
> Crispin
> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 1999 10:47 PM
> To: wg-c@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [wg-c] Eureka?

> In particular, of course, I don't believe ICANN should enable
> exclusive registries.  Nor do I think that registries should pick
> their TLDs -- I think that there should be many registries, but that
> they should  bid to run TLDs with fixed term renewable contracts.