Re: [wg-c] Eureka?

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@ebarn.com>]

Paranoid or not, there are deeper, more disturbing implications with your
statements. While it might be stretch to make the statement that you are
going to sue your way into the root, the mistrust and complete lack of
cooperation that your statements expose is very telling.

Did it ever occur to you that there is a larger issue here that is far more
important than your wait for Mike and Esther to "take the one necessary step
that paints the proper target on their back"?

Or is this simply a tacky charade for you to fulfill some larger agenda?

I'm pretty confident in what your answers will be, but these questions need
to be asked for the benefit of the casual reader.

-RWR

-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Ambler <cambler@iodesign.com>
To: wg-c@dnso.org <wg-c@dnso.org>
Date: Saturday, August 07, 1999 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: [wg-c] Eureka?


>> I don't want to debate what the word "threat" means, but these
>> statements from you meet my definition of the word...
>
>Those aren't threats, those are statements that if a company is
>harmed, the company is not afraid to take action to protect
>itself. That's very different from "suing one's way into the
>root."
>
>You're a paranoid little man, Kent.
>
>Christopher