Re: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal

["Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>]

At 17:18 12-08-99 -0700, Christopher Ambler wrote:
>Unlike CORE, IOD has never claimed to be in
>charge, has never claimed to be the anointed successor of the root,

Dear Chris:

Hold her, Myrt, you're a runnin' for the pea patch!

CORE did not claim to be the anointed one.  Every indication we had from 
the IAHC folk was that they knew where the rocks were.  We now know to our 
disadvantage that they didn't know where the stream was.

>and has never claimed that its registry would be in the root by a
>certain date, changing that date as it came and went. It also has
>not chosen a TLD that was previously trademarked.

Tell me, Chris, which Trademark office now or ever in the past would 
register a TLD?

Regards, BobC





~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"One test is worth three expert opinions!"
Ulric B. Bray