Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll

["Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@dninet.net>]

why dont you try  to a response built on some sort of a foundation other
than personal derision chris ?

do you feel that you should "own"  a gtld chris ?

ken

----- Original Message -----
From: Christopher Ambler <cambler@iodesign.com>
To: <wg-c@dnso.org>; A.M. Rutkowski <amr@netmagic.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 1999 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll


> Indeed. For someone who views the domain name system as a public
> trust, Ken, it's highly suspect that your organization filed for
trademarks
> on
> 6 TLDs (one of which already enjoys trademark protection).
>
> Hypocrite is a very weak term in this case.
>
> --
> Personal Opinion Only, of course...
> This email address belongs to a resident of the State of Washington,
> who does not accept unsolicited commercial email.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: A.M. Rutkowski <amr@netmagic.com>
> To: <wg-c@dnso.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 1999 10:28 AM
> Subject: Re: [wg-c] GTLD Straw poll
>
>
> > Hi Ken,
> >
> >  >"we should consider viewing  gtld's as a "public trust"
> >
> > Doesn't the gTLD-MoU under which your organization was created
> > assert that the entire DNS name space is a "public trust?"
> > Isn't this reinforced by the GAC's declaration that "the
> > Internet naming and addressing system is a public resource?"
> >
> >
> >  >naturally you could develop methodologies for evaluating the
> administration
> >  >of this trust and  a periodic process could be put  into place to
insure
> >  >that the "trust" was always placed in the most efficient and effective
> care
> >  >(i.e. periodic review and re-bidding)
> >
> >
> > Maybe we could begin with the following "public trusts":
> >
> > NEW-DOMAINS.ORG
> > GET-DOMAINS.COM
> > WEB-TRAVELER.ORG
> > WEB-TRAVELER.NET
> > TRAVEL-EUROPE.NET
> > WEB-TRAVEL.ORG
> > SUPER8EXPERIENCE.COM
> > NEW-DOMAINS.NET
> > RESORTNETWORK.NET
> > VACATIONNETWORK.NET
> > POSTEL.ORG
> > INKJETINFO.COM
> > REALESTATESALES.ORG
> > THE-VILLAGES.NET
> >
> >
> > --tony
> >
>
>