Re: Brands, TLDs, and Private Ownership (Was:Re: [wg-c]

["Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>]

I am not at liberty to discuss the particulars of the case at this time,
nor do I wish to rehash it other than to point out that the assertion
was false.

I would refer you to the published transcript if you have questions
about the ruling, or IOD's attorneys if you wish to ask specific
questions.

--
Christopher Ambler
Personal Opinion Only, of course
This address belongs to a resident of the State of Washington
who does not wish to receive any unsolicited commercial email
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
To: <wg-c@dnso.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 1999 3:15 PM
Subject: Re: Brands, TLDs, and Private Ownership (Was:Re: [wg-c]


> On Wed, Aug 18, 1999 at 03:03:19PM -0700, Christopher Ambler wrote:
> [...]
> > 
> > For the 195th time, we dropped the suit at the request of the USG.
> 
> At the request of the USG???  That's new news -- pray tell more!  
> Who in the USG made this request?  What were there reasons for 
> interfering with the lawsuit?
> 
> -- 
> Kent Crispin                               "Do good, and you'll be
> kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
>