Re[2]: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder

["William X. Walsh" <william@dso.net>]

Wednesday, August 18, 1999, 3:12:01 PM, Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 18, 1999 at 02:54:30PM -0700, William X. Walsh wrote:
> [...]
>> Option 2 does not say that if we do the initial ones, that unless we
>> stop it then we open the flood gates.  No one here, most certainly not
>> me, has advocated that.
>> 
>> The only difference is the burden is on those who want to stop new
>> TLDs to justify any delays or stops.

> Realistically, they will have to justify any delays or stops in 
> option 1, as well.  So I think your vote for option 2 is really a 
> vote for option 1.  Thank you for voting for option 1. :-)

> Tell you what -- why don't you stop trying to reinterpret other 
> people's votes, and I will stop trying to reinterpret yours? :-)


Seems Jonathon already clarified this for the list, and spelled out
what he meant.  Your comments above are not consistent with the facts,
but that's not unusual.


--
William X. Walsh - DSo Internet Services
Email: william@dso.net  Fax:(209) 671-7934
Editor of http://www.dnspolicy.com/

(IDNO MEMBER)
Support the Cyberspace Association, the 
constituency of Individual Domain Name Owners 
http://www.idno.org