[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] A branded TLD would be .nsi

To: <wg-c@dnso.org>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] A branded TLD would be .nsi
From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 17:34:21 -0700
References: <3.0.2.32.19990818145027.00d15334@pop.interport.net> <3.0.2.32.19990818202808.00d505c0@pop.interport.net>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

> >Both Ambler and NSI want to be the exclusive registry
> >for a specific TLD string, .web and .com respectively.

I do so wish you all would stop saying that "Ambler" wants
this or that. Do you say that "Rutt" wants this or that? Does
"Gomes" or perhaps "Clough" want .com?

Image Online Design runs the .web registry. I am a shareholder,
not even the majority one at that. It is not I, it is IOD.

<sarcasm>
I appreciate the confidence you all place in me in identifying me
with the company in which I hold interest.
</sarcasm>

Christopher

References:
- [wg-c] Re: Where has NSI claimed that it "owns .COM" ?
  - From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <martys@interport.net>
- [wg-c] A branded TLD would be .nsi
  - From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <martys@interport.net>

Prev by Date: [wg-c] A branded TLD would be .nsi
Next by Date: Re: [Fwd: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder]
Prev by thread: [wg-c] A branded TLD would be .nsi
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] A branded TLD would be .nsi
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread