Re: [wg-c] straw vote -- question one results & call for votes on remaining questions

["Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>]

> I would suppose that the logical alternative for those who wanted many
> is lets start with few if many is not possible [today]
> and not either many or nothing

And I would suppose that the logical alternative for those who
wanted few is lets start with many if few is not possible [today]
and not either few or nothing.

I'd be wrong, of course, and I submit that you're wrong, too.

Christopher