[wg-c] Separating the Sheep from the Goats

["Kevin J. Connolly" <CONNOLLK@rspab.com>]

Why don't we cut to the chase?

Short of administering Guttman scales to the whole WG
or factoring phi-matrices of responses to a comprehensive
battery of attitude questions, why don't we get down to 
the first crucial question:

Who objects to/endorses rolling out around a half-dozen gtlds over
six months, followed by accelerated rollouts after an evaluation
period?  Objectors, please state whether the objection is because
(A) It's not fast enough/big enough (including "it fails to lock ICANN
into LOTS of new TLDs");
(B) It's too fast/big
( C ) We can't answer this question in isolation.

I call this the first crucial question because the split over this issue
really does dictate who's going to adhere to which reports.

HELLO?  There isn't going to be consensus about this issue.
Let's stop kidding ourselves.

KJC

**********************************************************************
The information contained in this electronic message is confidential
and is or may be protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work
product doctrine, joint defense privileges, trade secret protections,
and/or other applicable protections from disclosure.  If the reader of
this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this com-
munication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communi-
cation in error, please immediately notify us by calling our Help Desk
at 212-541-2000 ext.3314, or by e-mail to helpdesk@rspab.com
**********************************************************************