Re: [wg-c] Trying to close on Question 1

[Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>]

On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 09:31:00PM -0400, A.M. Rutkowski wrote:
[...]
> 
> What is not apparent is the argument that could be used for
> an ICANN result that significantly reduces the average monthly
> increase in TLDs.  Anyone care to posit a justification to a
> hypothetical court?

The increase in TLDs has come exclusively through the addition of
ccTLDS, a bounded, well-defined set, added as they become ready. 
Since it is a bounded set, the rate of addition must at some point
slow, and eventually stop.  The rate of addition has essentially 
nothing to do with IANA/ICANN policy.

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Do good, and you'll be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain