Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] is this really the work we have before us?

[John Charles Broomfield <jbroom@manta.outremer.com>]

> > The point of this particular argument is an attempt (very long shot anyway)
> > to somehow prove that regular re-bidding of registry operators for any given
> > TLD is a terrible idea.
> 
> > The argument goes like this:
> > You have to invest millions to market "your" (horrible word there, watch
> > out) gTLD. You have to invest millions in equipment and staff to get it up
> > and running (apparently from day one, with no return guarantee, instead of
> > -as with NSI- building up as you need to deliver heavier services). So,
> > given all that, no company in the world in its right senses would EVER bid
> > on a tender that demands a re-bid 5 years later, despite the obvious
> > benefits that this would give the rest of the community.
> 
> You know, you have a real point here.
> 
> As a matter of fact, lets carry it to its logical conclusion.
> Automobiles are a mainstay of our societies.  Rather than let the
> automobile manufacturers maintain their ability to be the builder and
> sales outlet for a particular design they developed and invested in,
> they will only get that right for xx years, after which continued
> manufacture and sale will be rebid to the lowest bidder.

As approached by you, the argument of course will look ridiculous, but the
simple question that must be answered so that we can all know which side of
the argument is this:

Can companies invent gTLDs and have them as their own property?
If yes, then of course, the argument is as you indicate, like the one of car
makers with their models.
If no, the we are on my side of the argument, in that the g in gTLD means
GENERIC, and as such no particular company can claim the right to it.
If we have both sides "yes" and "no", as in "generics are generics and
cannot be owned, but trademarks could be converted into TLDs, and would be
owned", then we have the question of should trademarks be allowed to exist
as TLDs?

I am very strongly of the opinion that GENERICS should not be "given away". I
feel very strongly that a term like "web" is very much a generic, and
therefore I find it ridiculous for it to be claimed in ownership by a
company.
I am also very strongly against the idea of letting trademarks exist as
TLDs, because I believe that just puts the ".com" problem one step higher
because every company would prefer to have its own TLD and eliminate the
messy bits at the end (messy bits like ".com" or ".fr" or ".uk" or ".net" or
even ".web").

Yours, John Broomfield.