[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do

To: "Mark C. Langston" <skritch@home.com>, "Dave Crocker" <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 12:41:27 -0700
Cc: <wg-c@dnso.org>
References: <Your message of "Mon, 23 Aug 1999 11:05:10 PDT." <4.2.0.58.19990823110119.00a8bef0@shell2.bayarea.net> <4.2.0.58.19990823122446.00a89c60@shell2.bayarea.net>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

You're both tilting at windmills. This issue is moot until we find out
the disposition of NSI's situation. Until then, why don't we concentrate
on matters upon which we can make some progress?

Unless, of course, the deliberate delays of progress is your aim, in
which case I suspect you'll keep up this argument.

--
Christopher Ambler
Personal Opinion Only, of course
This address belongs to a resident of the State of Washington
who does not wish to receive any unsolicited commercial email

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: "Mark C. Langston" <skritch@home.com>

References:
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread