[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do

To: John Charles Broomfield <jbroom@manta.outremer.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <amr@netmagic.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 21:00:11 -0400
Cc: wg-c@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: <199908260044.UAA06374@manta.outremer.com>
References: <4.2.0.58.19990823192800.00aee100@mail.netmagic.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

Hi John,

What do you think?

I think NSF will not discriminate among the
820 awardees who received the 5280 CISE awards.
The assets remain those of the awardee. That was
the plan and the policy. I can't imagine they
would take those billions away from MCI Worldcom,
Verio, Sprint...much less the table scraps that
NSI ended up with.

--tony

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>

References:
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <amr@netmagic.com>
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: John Charles Broomfield <jbroom@manta.outremer.com>

Prev by Date: [wg-c] Proposal of statement to be forwarded to ICANN
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread