[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do

To: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>, "Dave Crocker" <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@ebarn.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 14:46:33 -0400
Cc: <mueller@syr.edu>, <wg-c@dnso.org>
References: <199908261600.MAA14719@manta.outremer.com><4.2.0.58.19990826100311.00a5a600@shell2.bayarea.net> <4.2.0.58.19990826103607.00a8daa0@shell2.bayarea.net> <00c901beefeb$f82240e0$7f4888cf@idirect.com> <002d01beeff1$b82cc090$7bfe3b9d@redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

<sigh>

> To which I have to ask, "so what?"
>
> There is no reason to regulate the cost of the registry when there is the
> open market for anyone to open a registry. In a single-registry system,
> like IAHC had proposed, yes - that would make sense. In a free
> economy, with multiple registries, that is unnecessary regulation.

No one has brought up regulation.

We were having a (highly irrelevant) discussion about NSI's actual cost in
comparison of their retail price. As you so pointedly explained, the market
price of a product is set by the market, and I, for one, am not willing to
pay $9 to NSI.

-RWR

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>

References:
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: John Charles Broomfield <jbroom@manta.outremer.com>
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@ebarn.com>
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread