Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do

[dwmaher@ibm.net]

At 12:36 AM 8/29/99 -0400, Jonathan Weinberg wrote:
>	Kent's formulation suggests that -- just maybe -- many of us might agree
>on a system in which a registry might or might not be operated on a
>strictly cost-recovery basis, but *all* registries would be subject to some
>sort of meaningful limitation on their ability to raise prices.
>(Obviously, formulating such a limitation isn't straightforward, and some
>folks have suggested to the list that it can't be done.  Yet I wonder.)
>What do people think?
 
Makes good sense to me.
David Maher