Re: [wg-c] Output of the WG

["Siegfried Langenbach" <svl@nrw.net>]

I agree,
even offending some people, that is not a working-group any more.
lets assemble the real results, making sure both (or more ?) groups have 
the opportunity to describe the own position.
siegfried

On 31 Aug 99, at 6:42, Robert F. Connelly wrote:

> At 12:17 30-08-1999 +0200, Javier wrote:
> >Also, the exchanges get off-topic very quickly, producing large amounts of 
> >e-mails that are of no interest in the search for consensus on the core 
> >topics of the working group, and scare off possible participants in these 
> >key issues. The result is that we are not being able to drive the 
> >discussion towards consensus building.
> 
> Dear Javier:
> 
> I totally concur.  There are so many persons sharpening their own axes that 
> it we must spend valuable time trying to figure out what the hidden agendas 
> are.
> 
> Messages have been received at the rate of 8 per hour this morning in Japan.
> 
> I have been busy with essential business concerns and have not been able to 
> even read most of the recent postings.  The Roar of noise exceeds the 
> signal level.  As a friend once wrote, "We have filled in the background 
> till the foreground went underground."
> 
> BobC
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> "I've sawed this board off three times, and it's *still* too short".
> 
> Carpenter foreman.
>