Re: [wg-c] WG C Straw Pole vote

[Raul Echeberria <raul@inia.org.uy>]

At 04:07 PM 31/08/1999 -0400, Jonathan Weinberg wrote:
>	I think there's some confusion here.  The Names Council has
>decided that we're not doing our job, and has asked Working Group D to
>come up with ways in which Javier and I might adjust our structure.  The
>NC has made absolutely no suggestion, though, that we be abolished.  Nor,
>for that matter, does *anyone* in Working Group D seem to think that, or
>that our membership should be restricted.  To the extent that WG-D comes
>up with proposals that will allow us more efficiently to do our job,
>that's a good thing -- in any event, we're still in business.[*]

Jonathan:

I think you have done a very well job and I support your position. Nobody
said that you could not work until the Name Council would have any outcome
from WG-D
.
The unique problem is that since the resolution of the Name Council is
public, it is possible that many people would be less interested in working
in the WG-C waiting the next NC resolution about the future of this working
group after receive the WG-D suggestions.

Best Regards, 


Raul Echeberria -
raul@inia.org.uy

ENRED - Foro Latinoamericano de Redes
Presidente Alterno
http://www.enred.org