Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@ebarn.com>]

>>
>> Yes, new gTLDs should be created. They should be deployed in such a
fashion
>> that they become virtually unlimited in number. Initially, ten new gTLDs
>> should be deployed through a process similar to the ICANN/NSI/DOC
>> test-bed. The specific TLDs deployed during this test-bed should be
>> determined by the registries selected to participate.
>
>This simply won't work, in my opinion.  It would mean that a method
>for resolving conflicts between registries would have to be already
>in place -- we couldn't wait for a lawsuit between CORE and
>IODesign to complete, for example.
>


Which is precisely why the test bed TLDs should have had no prior
use...btw, that sound you hear is my proposal sticking its head in the sand
about what to do after the test bed...

Suggestions?

-RWR