Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@ebarn.com>]

> > This is irrelevant to the process. In my mind, the test-bed would be
> > implemented solely for the purpose of tweaking the business, operational
> and
> > technical processes and *not* to pander to individual or corporate
> > interests. The number can be created arbritrarily without deference to
the
> > points you raise above for the simple fact it is a *pilot* project - not
> the
> > final implementation.
>
> It doesn't matter what your intentions are, nor what you call it - the
> effects are the same. A rose by any other name...

This is pretty powerful rhetoric - especially in light of the fact that you
do not make clear what the implied effects would be. Please either clarify
or get out of the way.

-RWR