RE: [wg-c] compromise proposal

["Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>]

While I agree with Roeland, I wonder if perhaps it is at least helpful to
"introduce" ourselves to each other, as we would no doubt do "socially". For
instance, I'm happy for folks to know that I work for AT&T and am the
director of Internet, Online, and E-Commerce Advocacy. I am also a member of
a number of associations and other interested groups but in this working
group, I represent only AT&T's interests.  

Regards, Marilyn

-----Original Message-----
From: Roeland M.J. Meyer [mailto:rmeyer@mhsc.com]
Sent: Friday, September 03, 1999 12:07 AM
To: measday@josmarian.ch
Cc: 'Jonathan Weinberg'; wg-c@dnso.org
Subject: RE: [wg-c] compromise proposal



> Is it possible to ask that organizational affiliation be inserted into
> these emails? The weight of a measured argument is the
> greater for being
> supported by, say, INTA or ICC,  and the less for being an individual
> voice of someone who just happens to work for such an organization.

Mark,
I dare say that this is unimportant. There are very few of us here that
do not represent one sort of organization or another. Many of us
support/represent more than one interest. In these debates, we have been
there before. Usually, it is a source of disruptive conflict.

--------------------
Roeland M.J. Meyer, CEO
Morgan Hill Software Company, Inc.
http://www.mhsc.com/
mailto://rmeyer@mhsc.com
--------------------