Re: [wg-c] Compromise proposal

[Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>]

Peter:
If these conditions are met I cannot see how 10 new gTLDs would be
any different from 3 new gTLDs. In other words, if these protections work,
10 vs 3 won't make any serious difference. This is especially true because,
as Rutkowski has noted, we have been adding new ccTLDs--many of which could
be open to cybersquatting as much as any new gTLD--at a much faster rate.

I think it is important for the TM/IP constituency members to address this question afresh, in the spirit of conciliation and compromise.

Petter Rindforth wrote:

> _Before_ any
> new gTLDs can be introduced we must havea)
> a speedy and effective dispute resolution process (preferably mandatory)b)
> a system for protecting famous and well-known trademarks across all gTLDs,
> andc) an easy and cost-effective
> system for obtaining full contact information