Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal

[Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>]

Read RFCs 920 and 1591.
Both gTLDs and ccTLDs were defined and delegated under them. Same.

Off to London, won't be reading your reply. 'Bye.

--MM

[don't add any gTLDs while I'm gone, OK?]

Kent Crispin wrote:

> A claim of a "permanent right to a delegation" is not the issue at
> all.  The issue is the policy underlying the delegation to begin
> with.  This is completely and transparently obvious -- no new gTLDs
> have been delegated; many ccTLDs have been delegated.  If they were
> under the same delegation policy, then we would have many new gTLDs,
> as well.
>
> --
> Kent Crispin                               "Do good, and you'll be
> kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain