RE: [wg-c] Votebot sample ballot.

["Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

Hello Joop,

For a lot of reasos, simplicity being one of them, I think that votes on
WG-C issues, on this track, should be open and not anonymous.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-wg-c@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-c@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Joop
> Teernstra
> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 1999 2:23 PM
> To: Robert F. Connelly; wg-c@dnso.org
> Cc: Dan Busarow
> Subject: RE: [wg-c] Votebot sample ballot.
>
>
> At 05:06 PM 9/09/1999 +0900, Robert F. Connelly wrote:
>
> >The advantage of Dan's system (which Joop's may share) is
> that we can see
> >just who votes for what.  Everyone will know.  If Bill
> Semich votes for
> >zero new gTLDs, most of us will conclude that he wants to
> protect his .nu
> >fiefdom.
> >
> My Booth is set up to protect the anonimity of the vote in principle,
> although voters may optionally fill in their name.
> Only for anti-fraud purposes, the system can identify voters
> to lock out
> double voting and the system logs can be analyzed to detect
> irregularities.
>
> Whatever you decide, I can enter the vote options if you all
> wish and make
> the system available for this WG.
>
>
>
> --Joop--
> www.idno.org
>