[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work

To: wg-c@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
From: Mikki Barry <ooblick@netpolicy.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 23:52:18 -0400
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19990910233408.054eb5b8@msen.com>
References: <3.0.3.32.19990906172215.05347390@msen.com><3.0.3.32.19990910233408.054eb5b8@msen.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

I say add the 6 to 10 new gTLDs, and make the evaluation period VERY 
quick.  It's already been far too long.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
  - From: Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>
- Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
  - From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>

References:
- [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
  - From: Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com>
- Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
  - From: Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com>
- Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
  - From: Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] Well, maybe this won't work
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread