Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C

["Mark C. Langston" <skritch@home.com>]

On 17 September 1999, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:


>> 	3. Javier and I have determined that, on the basis of the messages
>> submitted to the list, the "6-10" proposal is supported by rough
>> consensus.
>
>nice try.  but no.  it quite clearly was not.


With all due respect Randy, I believe what the co-chair of the group is
saying is that:  We, as co-chairs, have declared there is consensus on
the issue.

They are not saying:  We think this is the case, please give us your
opinion.

-- 
Mark C. Langston	LATEST: ICANN refuses	Let your voice be heard:
mark@bitshift.org  to consider application for       http://www.idno.org
Systems Admin    Constituency status from organized http://www.icann.org
San Jose, CA      individual domain name owners      http://www.dnso.org