RE: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's New Consensus(w as:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )

[Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>]

At 05:16 PM 9/22/99 , Kevin J. Connolly wrote:
>opinion.  There are lots of reasons why they might not have been paying
>attention, including, most particularly, that a proposal was being touted to
>reduce/restrict the membership of WG-C.  The fact that the membership
>has not been winnowed does not detract from the validity of members'
>decisions not to waste their time or that of others by continuing a debate
>in which their voices and/or votes would play no dispositive role.

This working group is where this work is supposed to take place.  Those not 
participating in this working group have chosen not to participate.  They 
have chosen to defer the matter to the work of those who DO 
participate.  Any other model ensures that decisions never get made.

d/


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dave Crocker                                         Tel: +1 408 246 8253
Brandenburg Consulting                               Fax: +1 408 273 6464
675 Spruce Drive                             <http://www.brandenburg.com>
Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA                 <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>