Re: [wg-c] Comments?

[Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>]

At 10:50 AM 9/28/1999 , A.M. Rutkowski wrote:
> >Principles to Guide ICANN's Delegation of gTLD Management.
>
>Clearly all of this - especially the far fetched
>provisions - need to be re-evaluated in light of

Since Craig's list represents a good summary of the dominant views among 
the community, the dismissive language suggests an attitude that is, 
itself, far fetched.

>the new agreement that defines ICANN's future.
>Most of these religious belief kind of provisions
>are non-starters, and many contrary to the agreement.

The regligion comes from such frivolous dismissals.

>The fact sheet is a good place to start:

Constructive and detailed commentary would be an even better place to 
start, instead of working so hard to feed the flames of emotion.


At 10:29 AM 9/28/1999 , Christopher Ambler wrote:
>I cannot support this at all. Your statements about intellectual
>property are wrong in that such property currently exists.

Constantly making the claim on these lists does not, somehow, turn them 
into statements of fact.

d/

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dave Crocker                                         Tel: +1 408 246 8253
Brandenburg Consulting                               Fax: +1 408 273 6464
675 Spruce Drive                             <http://www.brandenburg.com>
Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA                 <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>