Re: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone

["William X. Walsh" <william@dso.net>]

On 28-Sep-99 Dave Crocker wrote:
> At 02:17 PM 9/28/1999 , John Charles Broomfield wrote:
>>         Seeing that the only thing we more or less managed consensus on
>>serves nearly no purpose, and that the big roadblock to more discussions and
>>consensus building has been (IMO) lifted, I think that just giving us 3 days
>>to post drafts is somewhat premature.
> 
> Try the other view of this event, namely that the increased clarity of the 
> situation should permit us to move more decisively.
> 

3 days is not sufficient time to move at all, or even to have time to
sufficiently analyze the impact these agreements will have on the subject of
the drafts.

A delay in light of this is perfectly reasonable, and indeed mandated by an
event such as this.

--
William X. Walsh - DSo Internet Services
Email: william@dso.net  Fax:(209) 671-7934
Editor of http://www.dnspolicy.com/