[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WG-C RULES was Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper

To: "Mark C. Langston" <skritch@home.com>, wg-c@dnso.org
Subject: Re: WG-C RULES was Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <amr@netmagic.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 1999 11:24:59 -0400
In-Reply-To: <199910091514.IAA23930@agamemnon.home.com>
References: <Your message of "Sat, 09 Oct 1999 11:11:37 EDT." <4.2.1.10.19991009110318.00b222f0@mail.netmagic.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

At 11:14 AM 10/9/99 , Mark C. Langston wrote:
>You may think them unfair.  You may chafe at their imposition.
>Feel free to do so.   But do it silently.

Mark,

I will not do so, and you have no basis for
insisting otherwise.


--tony

References:
- Re: WG-C RULES was Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  - From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <amr@netmagic.com>
- Re: WG-C RULES was Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
  - From: "Mark C. Langston" <skritch@home.com>

Prev by Date: Re: WG-C RULES was Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] position paper
Prev by thread: Re: WG-C RULES was Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] Short Position Paper
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread