Re: [wg-c] modified proposal

["Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>]

The simple problem is that this position paper proposes a
structure other than that which has been given to NSI in their
new agreement with ICANN. It would create new registries
that had a fundamental restriction (indeed plural - restrictions)
placed upon them and models imposed upon them that
NSI, in its position as registry for .com, .net, and .org 
simply does not have to follow.

This is, at best, unfair, and at worst, (although, not being
a lawyer, I rely upon the opinion of those who are)
illegal.

Let's see a proposal that takes into account the current
state of the existing registry for non country-code TLDs,
namely, NSI. 

Anything else is wishful thinking on the part of the author.

Christopher

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
To: <wg-c@dnso.org>
Sent: Sunday, October 10, 1999 11:40 PM
Subject: [wg-c] modified proposal


>                   Position Paper on New gTLDs