Re: [wg-c] position papers

["Keith Gymer" <keith.gymer@btinternet.com>]

Ditto - I support Caroline's paper

Keith Gymer
Page Hargrave
Manfield House
1 Southampton Street
London
WC2R 0LR

----- Original Message -----
From: Cohen, Tod <Tod_Cohen@mpaa.org>
To: 'Jonathan Weinberg' <weinberg@mail.msen.com>; <bill@mail.nic.nu>;
<wg-c@dnso.org>
Sent: 15 October 1999 13:53
Subject: RE: [wg-c] position papers


> I would like to sign on to Caroline Chicoine's position paper.
>
> Tod Cohen
> Motion Picture Association of America
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Weinberg [mailto:weinberg@mail.msen.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 15, 1999 12:48 AM
> To: bill@mail.nic.nu; wg-c@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [wg-c] position papers
>
> Craig Simon
> <http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-c/Archives/msg01837.html>
> Roeland Meyer
> <http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-c/Archives/msg01914.html>
> contains urls
> Milton Mueller
> <http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-c/Archives/msg01915.html>
> Caroline Chicoine
> <http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-c/Archives/msg01916.html>
> Jon Weinberg
> <http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-c/Archives/msg01922.html>
> Eric Brunner
> <http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-c/Archives/msg01958.html>
> Kent Crispin (revised version)
> <http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-c/Archives/msg01960.html>
> Paul Stahura
> <http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-c/Archives/msg01995.html>.
>
> Jon
>
>
> At 12:14 AM 10/15/99 -0400, J. William Semich wrote:
> >Can you please remind us all of who posted these 8 position
> papers and the
> >dates they were posted, so we can be sure we have reviewed
> them all?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Bill Semich
> >.NU Domain Ltd
> >
> >At 11:21 PM 10/14/99 -0400, Jonathan Weinberg wrote:
> >>Well, time is passing, so let's do this:
> >>
> >> Every position-paper drafter who wants his or her
> position paper included
> >>as part of the WG-C interim report should submit a final
> version to me by
> >>the end of Monday, along with the names of signatories
> (and a notation, as
> >>to each, whether he or she is a member of the WG).
> >>
> >> My inclination, right now, is that the interim
> report (incorporating the
> >>position papers) should be a plain text document, given
> that (1) that would
> >>simplify distribution of the document for public comment;
> and (2) all but
> >>one of the eight people who've sent position papers to the
> list submitted
> >>them as text documents in any event.  Roeland, can you
> live with this?
> >>Javier -- your thoughts?  Does anybody else have strong
> feelings?
> >>
> >>Jon
> >>
> >>
> >>Jonathan Weinberg
> >>co-chair, WG-C
> >>weinberg@msen.com
> >>
> >
> >
>