[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] Position paper: Commentary on three points.

To: wg-c@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [wg-c] Position paper: Commentary on three points.
From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 09:01:33 -0700
In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.19991015100242.009cbbf0@127.0.0.1>; from Joseph Friedman on Fri, Oct 15, 1999 at 11:09:51AM -0400
Mail-Followup-To: wg-c@dnso.org
References: <4.2.0.58.19991015100242.009cbbf0@127.0.0.1>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

On Fri, Oct 15, 1999 at 11:09:51AM -0400, Joseph Friedman wrote:
> I would like to comment on three (separate but somewhat related) points.

I agree with all your points, except:

> 2) ICANN as registry.

ICANN is prohibited  from being a registry, either in the bylaws or 
in one of the agreements with the USG (I forget exactly where).

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Do good, and you'll be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wg-c] Position paper: Commentary on three points.
  - From: Joseph Friedman <josephf@touro.edu>

References:
- [wg-c] Position paper: Commentary on three points.
  - From: Joseph Friedman <josephf@touro.edu>
- [wg-c] Position paper: Commentary on three points.
  - From: Joseph Friedman <josephf@touro.edu>

Prev by Date: [wg-c] Position paper: Commentary on three points.
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] Position paper: Commentary on three points.
Prev by thread: [wg-c] Position paper: Commentary on three points.
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] Position paper: Commentary on three points.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread