RE: [wg-c] position papers

["Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

Yes, I have modifications to make and, due to technical problems, I am not
doing the Visio drawings that I had planned. It seems a bit too much work
compared to what the others have done anyway. When I get my wordprocessor
reinstalled I will make the changes and dump a text-only version. BTW, I
have barely been able to follow half of the discussion because I haven't
gotten my mail fully functional yet. It's hard to wade through 300 messages
per day without filters.<sigh>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-wg-c@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-c@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
> Jonathan Weinberg
> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 1999 8:22 PM
> To: wg-c@dnso.org
> Subject: [wg-c] position papers
>
>
> Well, time is passing, so let's do this:
>
> 	Every position-paper drafter who wants his or her position
> paper included
> as part of the WG-C interim report should submit a final version to me by
> the end of Monday, along with the names of signatories (and a notation, as
> to each, whether he or she is a member of the WG).
>
> 	My inclination, right now, is that the interim report
> (incorporating the
> position papers) should be a plain text document, given that (1)
> that would
> simplify distribution of the document for public comment; and (2) all but
> one of the eight people who've sent position papers to the list submitted
> them as text documents in any event.  Roeland, can you live with this?
> Javier -- your thoughts?  Does anybody else have strong feelings?
>
> Jon
>
>
> Jonathan Weinberg
> co-chair, WG-C
> weinberg@msen.com
>