[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
>Kent also suggested that while many of us support a mix of non-profit and
>for-profit gTLDs (indeed, looking at the four most "popular" position
>papers, some form of mixed system gets support from most of the signers of
>position paper A, plus the signers of B, C, and D), he thought we could
>reach rough consensus that it would be safer to *start* with non-profit
>registries. (Please stop me if I'm remembering this, or any other
>statement, incorrectly.)
Not by a longshot. If we do, indeed, start with 6-10 as consensus seems to
indicate, we should not elevate any business model above any other.
That is tantamount to claiming that one model is "better" than another
and therefore more deserving of going first. All models are deserving
of participating in any "testbed" phase.
Christopher