Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting

[John Charles Broomfield <jbroom@manta.outremer.com>]

> > Chris: you (and others) are on record for saying that you have nothing
> > against the non-profit registry scenario, so *that* scenario is seemingly
> > acceptable all around.
> 
> That's not true. I have never said such a thing. What I have said is that I
> have nothing against BOTH for-profit and non-profit coexisting. Your
> (admittedly stupid) example above doesn't enter into it. It's the two
> models in question, and the answer is BOTH. Not one, not the other,
> but both.
> 
> You are taking my approval of "both" and inferring that I mean one
> and the other, but not linked. That's not the case.
> 
> Christopher

I know, that's why I say you're taking hostages, where the hostage is the
non-profit scenario.

Yours, John Broomfield.