[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting

To: John Charles Broomfield <jbroom@manta.outremer.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@dso.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 1999 13:21:21 -0800 (PST)
Cc: wg-c@dnso.org, (Christopher Ambler) <cambler@iodesign.com>
In-Reply-To: <199911052121.RAA18756@manta.outremer.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org


On 05-Nov-99 John Charles Broomfield wrote:
> Chris: you (and others) are on record for saying that you have nothing
> against the non-profit registry scenario, so *that* scenario is seemingly
> acceptable all around.

And that has ALWAYS been said along with the phrase "provided it is not the
ONLY model."

--
William X. Walsh - DSo Internet Services
Email: william@dso.net  Fax:(209) 671-7934
Editor of http://www.dnspolicy.com/

References:
- Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  - From: John Charles Broomfield <jbroom@manta.outremer.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread