[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting

To: Eric Brunner <brunner@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@dso.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 1999 12:22:42 -0800 (PST)
Cc: wg-c@dnso.org, cambler@iodesign.com, mueller@syr.edu
In-Reply-To: <199911061338.IAA12507@world.std.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

On 06-Nov-99 Eric Brunner wrote:
> All,
> 
> Moving forward does not mean rounding up all the strays and pacifying
> them. It doesn't mean joining them in their ominous and murky world of

Eric, 

Your attempt tp bring a debating logic into WG-C is flawed.  You assumed because
someone decides it is not worth answering your rather creative and outlandish
challenges that they are conceding to you.

That is not the case at all.

--
William X. Walsh - DSo Internet Services
Email: william@dso.net  Fax:(209) 671-7934

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  - From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>

References:
- Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
  - From: Eric Brunner <brunner@world.std.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
Next by thread: RE: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread