Re: [wg-c] Unofficial report on L.A. meeting

["Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>]

> That's the reason that it is necessary to start with a non-profit 
> model -- conversion of a non-profit to a for-profit is not a 
> "taking", going the other way, arguably, is.

Again, this is moot.

Until and unless NSI is changed to a non-profit, new registries
cannot be constrained to non-profit only. To do so is (to my
understanding) illegal.

Can we at least argue about something upon which we have
some chance of control?

Christopher