[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [wg-c] The limits of theoretical debate: time for experiment
I concur with Milton's posting, and with Mark's statements here.
On 12-Nov-99 Mark C. Langston wrote:
>
> On 11 November 1999, katie@imt.net wrote:
>
>
>>11/11/99 th 4:47 pm mdt
>>
>>Hear, Hear!
>
>
> I support Milton's sentiment also. We've reached the point where we're
> not only debating implementation, but actively considering it, in
> testbed fashion.
>
> If it is to be a true testbed, let's test several models. The whole
> *point* of the testbed phase is to identify and weed out problems.
> No amount of debate, no amount of discussion could possibly go further
> than a simple test of these ideas.
>
> Let's move forward and see what does, and does not, work.
>
> At this point, the only technical limitations I can find for anything
> discussed here are those imposed by the current DNS system, and even
> these are being addressed in eDNS and DNSSec. Everything else is
> an implementation issue. It's time to suss out what does and does not
> work, and action is what's necessary here, not words.
>
> --
> Mark C. Langston
> mark@bitshift.org
> Systems Admin
> San Jose, CA
--
William X. Walsh - DSo Internet Services
Email: william@dso.net Fax:(209) 671-7934