Re: [wg-c] bounced message, reposted for ... and The limits of ...

["Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>]

Eric Brunner said...
> So every bit of variety, useful, dubious, and daft, has to be squeezed
> into the space of 6-10, rather than just attempting to do 6-10 on a set
> of least concern. I don't think ICANN has as a fundamental part of its
> raison d'etre taking unnecessary risk, and Milt's ecumenicism appears to
> call for every distinct risk factor to be savored to the fullest during
> the first testbed period.

What you think is the "set of least concern" might be simply frightening
to someone else. Not everyone holds your opinion. What you consider
to be a "risk factor" is, to me, a reasonable market-driven solution. Your
bias is showing.

It is simple FUD to classify all others as "dubious" and "daft" as a
result. In other words, refrain from making error-prone judgement 
calls and let the market decide.

As point of direct example, I find your proposal for .NAA to be
full of danger when each and every ethnic group gets up and 
sues for equal representation. Frightening.

The rest of your post was attacks on Milton, so I shall not comment
upon them.

Christopher