[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [wg-d] determining the make up of working group D

To: "'Randy Bush'" <randy@psg.com>
Subject: RE: [wg-d] determining the make up of working group D
From: Theresa Swinehart <Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 1999 12:00:02 -0400
Cc: wg-d@dnso.org
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <m11CPiu-0008G6C@rip.psg.com>
Reply-to: Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com
Sender: owner-wg-d@dnso.org

It's a good idea and agree. You've set an example others are beginning to
follow.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy@psg.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 1999 11:46 AM
> To: Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com
> Cc: wg-d@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [wg-d] determining the make up of working group D
>
>
> i really like to have folk's [conflicts of] interests on the
> table.  so i
> thought i would set an example.
>
> randy
>

References:
- RE: [wg-d] determining the make up of working group D
  - From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-d] Voting (Was "WG Principles")
Next by Date: [wg-d] Makeup? Makeup!
Prev by thread: RE: [wg-d] determining the make up of working group D
Next by thread: Re: [wg-d] determining the make up of working group D
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread