[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [wg-d] NC Elections. Was: ga] DNSO General Assembly - Revised Agenda
> In my opinion your interpretation is incorrect. "Nominated by a member
> of the GA" is a legitimate meaning of "nominated by the GA". If a body
> has no structure, then that is the only reasonable meaning.
an equally reasonable meaning, but still probably not completing the set, is
that it is majority vote.
> (d) The GA shall nominate, pursuant to procedures adopted by the NC
> and approved by the Board, persons to serve on the Board in those
> seats reserved for the DNSO.
>
> Therefore, the obvious thing to do is to charter a working group to
> develop those procedures...
i see who approves but not who proposes. hence the suggestion of a wg is
merely that.
>> But all of this assumes that the GA has a mechanism for deciding what the
>> nomination mechanism will be.
> The mechanism for deciding policy is to form WGs or drafting or
> research committees, and have the NC vote on the result.
you omitted the "in my opinion."
randy