RE: [wg-d] More Robert's Rules: Streamlining Voting

["Antony Van Couvering" <avc@interport.net>]

Mark Langston wrote,
+
+There's still one problem with this, and that is:  The Chair could
+call consensus when the one known dissenter is unable to respond.
+In this instance, if there's actually enough support for the position
+that there isn't consensus on the issue, someone else should be
+willing to challenge the call.
+

The call for consensus is obviously not instant.  It should last several
days at a minimum, to make sure that objections are heard.

Antony