[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [wg-d] Silence (Was: Streamlining Voting)

To: Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com, "'Antony Van Couvering'" <avc@interport.net>, wg-d@dnso.org
Subject: RE: [wg-d] Silence (Was: Streamlining Voting)
From: Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1999 22:21:05 +1200
In-Reply-To: <001101bee5be$976e7ca0$cfac2ca6@whqtig600a.mcit.com>
References: <002701bee5b9$e4239440$34ce70d8@chinatown.concentric.net>
Sender: owner-wg-d@dnso.org

At 03:03 PM 13/08/1999 -0400, Theresa Swinehart wrote:
>I agree with the observation that when it comes to approval it should be
>based on affirmative responses for the reasons pointed out.
>

Agreed. It is easy and straightforward to take a vote with the options for
assent or dissent.

--Joop Teernstra LL.M.--  , bootstrap  of
the Cyberspace Association,
the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
http://www.idno.org

References:
- RE: [wg-d] Silence (Was: Streamlining Voting)
  - From: "Antony Van Couvering" <avc@interport.net>
- RE: [wg-d] Silence (Was: Streamlining Voting)
  - From: Theresa Swinehart <Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-d] NC Elections. Was: ga] DNSO General Assembly - Revised Agenda
Next by Date: Re: [wg-d] Grievance Committee
Prev by thread: RE: [wg-d] Silence (Was: Streamlining Voting)
Next by thread: Re: [wg-d] Silence (Was: Streamlining Voting)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread