Re: [wg-d] "Interim Measures"

[Mikki Barry <ooblick@netpolicy.com>]

>Kent Crispin wrote:
>It would be great if DNSO WGs could be made to function as
>effectively as IETF WGs (and indeed I sent around a document based on
>RFC2418 in hopes of motivating that), but some people, such as
>yourself(*), seem bent on ditching the years of IETF experience.
>It's odd, therefore, for you to hold up the IETF as a model.

Perhaps that is because, in general, the IETF does not argue policy 
matters and sticks to technical issues of what is most efficient and 
what "running code" exists.  Unfortunately, the working groups are 
MOSTLY arguing policy matters, and are generally not discussing the 
technical issues at all.  Perhaps the working groups should stick to 
technical issues, as ICANN itself should be doing, and leave policy 
to those entities set up for policy - courts and governments.