[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-d] NC Elections. Was: ga] DNSO General Assembly - Revised Agenda

To: "Mark C. Langston" <skritch@home.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-d] NC Elections. Was: ga] DNSO General Assembly - Revised Agenda
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 09:41:31 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Elisabeth PORTENEUVE <Elisabeth.PORTENEUVE@cetp.ipsl.fr>, karl@CaveBear.com, baf@fausett.com, wg-d@dnso.org
References: <199908121622.SAA06385@balsa.cetp.ipsl.fr><199908121629.JAA12308@agamemnon.home.com>
Sender: owner-wg-d@dnso.org

> 1)  There are no At Large ICANN Board members, and the ICANN BoD has made
>     no effort to change that.

opinions vary

> 2)  The body in question here is the Names Council, not the ICANN BoD.

and that's pretty clear.

randy

References:
- Re: [wg-d] NC Elections. Was: ga] DNSO General Assembly - Revised Agenda
  - From: Elisabeth PORTENEUVE <Elisabeth.PORTENEUVE@cetp.ipsl.fr>
- Re: [wg-d] NC Elections. Was: ga] DNSO General Assembly - Revised Agenda
  - From: "Mark C. Langston" <skritch@home.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-d] NC Elections. Was: ga] DNSO General Assembly - RevisedAgenda
Next by Date: Re: [wg-d] NC Elections. Was: ga] DNSO General Assembly - RevisedAgenda
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-d] NC Elections. Was: ga] DNSO General Assembly - Revised Agenda
Next by thread: Re: [wg-d] NC Elections. Was: ga] DNSO General Assembly - RevisedAgenda
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread