[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [wg-d] Let's discuss the funding of ICANN - It's part of thebusiness plan ...

To: Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com
Subject: RE: [wg-d] Let's discuss the funding of ICANN - It's part of thebusiness plan ...
From: Mikki Barry <ooblick@netpolicy.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 17:34:07 -0400
Cc: "'Karl Auerbach'" <karl@CaveBear.com>, wg-d@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: <000901bef329$759106c0$bf6c20a6@whqtig600a.mcit.com>
References: <000901bef329$759106c0$bf6c20a6@whqtig600a.mcit.com>
Sender: owner-wg-d@dnso.org

Is there any itemized budget available so that we can have an 
educated opinion on whether it should be separated from the 
procedural issues?

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [wg-d] Let's discuss the funding of ICANN - It's part of the business plan ...
  - From: bill@mail.nic.nu (J. William Semich)

References:
- RE: [wg-d] Let's discuss the funding of ICANN - It's part ofthebusiness plan ...
  - From: Theresa Swinehart <Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com>
- RE: [wg-d] Let's discuss the funding of ICANN - It's part ofthebusiness plan ...
  - From: Theresa Swinehart <Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-d] Balanced Working Groups
Next by Date: Re: [wg-d] Names Council Motions
Prev by thread: RE: [wg-d] Let's discuss the funding of ICANN - It's part ofthebusiness plan ...
Next by thread: RE: [wg-d] Let's discuss the funding of ICANN - It's part of the business plan ...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread