[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [wg-e] FW: WG-E Report - Harmonized Draft
If anyone cannot retrieve one of the files, please let me know and I will
copy the draft into an email message.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@netsol.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2000 6:38 PM
To: wg-e@dnso.org
Subject: [wg-e] FW: WG-E Report - Harmonized Draft
Here is the harmonized draft. The first one is saved as a Word document,
the second as a text file.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2000 5:04 PM
To: 'Kilnam Chon'; Gomes, Chuck
Cc: Josh Elliott
Subject: WG-E Report - Harmonized Draft
<<Working Group E Report - Harmonized Draft.doc>> <<Working Group E Report
- Harmonized Draft - text file.rtf>> Chon/Josh,
I took a crack at harmonizing the different parts of the WG-E reports. I
structured the document following the outline of the original charter for
WG-E. I integrated the Part 2 report written by Zita and myself along with
the Part 3 and Part 4 reports written by Chon.
Note that some summary information needs to be added at the end regarding
working group activities.
Please feel free to critique this openly.
I am attaching a Word version and a text version of the file. The second
one was saved as a text file.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: Kilnam Chon [mailto:chon@cosmos.kaist.ac.kr]
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 6:41 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; 'Kilnam Chon'
Cc: Josh Elliott
Subject: Re: [wg-e] yokohama icann meetings; 7 weeks away
you, me and possibly josh as well as other potential participants.
let's move on to harmonize.
chon
To: josh,
would you like to join the harmonization of the parts 2~4 documents?
On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 08:18:32AM -0400, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> Chon,
>
> Would it work to post them all to the entire working group while at the
same
> time start to harmonizing them? I think it is critical to harmonize them
> but that will take a little time so it would be good in the meantime if
WG-E
> members could start reviewing each part independently and provide feedback
> that could be used in the harmonization process.
>
> The harmonization definitely needs to occur before posting at dnso.org. I
> will be happy to help with the harmonization process if you like. I would
> just need to know who the other people working on this are so we can
consult
> with one another.
>
> Chuck
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kilnam Chon [mailto:chon@cosmos.kaist.ac.kr]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 6:15 AM
> To: Gomes, Chuck; 'Kilnam Chon'
> Cc: 'zita@isi.edu'
> Subject: Re: [wg-e] yokohama icann meetings; 7 weeks away
>
>
> chuck,
>
> i read your report on part 2, and i will attach the parts 3 and 4 which
were
> wrote by myself. josh did not feel comfortable to deliver part 3 without
> more people to participate, and andrew has never responsed on part 4.
>
> how would you like to proceed with these parts, which have obvious
overlap?
> shall we post all to wg-e, or shall we edit them to harmonize before we
> post to wg-e, possibly followed by public comment at dnso.org?
>
> chon
>
****************************************************************************
> ***
>
> 2000.5.22
> 1. Title
>
> ICANN DNSO WG-E Global Outreach and Awareness
> Part 3: Outreach
>
> 2. Objective
>
> ICANN and DNSO need to outreach globally in order for these organizations
> to be viable. Geographical diversity as well as cultural diversity
> needs to be emphasized, too.
>
> 3. Case Studies
>
> There are several outreach efforts being undertaken now at ICANN such as
>
> ICANN At-Large Membership Drive
> APTLD Internet Seminar Tour
> Regional Meetings
>
> (1) ICANN At-Large Membership Drive
>
> ICANN has been working on the at-large membership from its inception,
> starting
> with Membership Advisory Committee. Recently, ICANN decided to have the
> at-large members as well as the related taskforce and committees. One of
> the
> role the at-large members play is to elect ICANN Board Directors from the
> at-large membership body. There are currently over 15,000 members, and
> ICANN expects to have 20,000 ~ 30,000 when it closes the membership drive
> at the end of July 2000. Many are from the developed countries, in
> particular
> from North America. It is important to have good geographical diversity
> as well as cultural diversity. Particular efforts are needed among
> developing
> and emerging countries as well as non-English speaking counries. Some of
> the notable efforts are in Asia where the membership drive with regional
> meetings are taking place. Similar efforts are needed in other parts of
> the world including central and south Asia, Latin America, Africa and
> Middle East.
>
> (2) APTLD Internet Seminar Tour
>
> APTLD with APIA started Internet Seminar Tour in Asia in 1999, and visited
> five countries to give seminars on the Internet governance as well as Y2K.
> Some of these countries formed committees and groups to work on the
Internet
> governance and participation to ICANN activities. Three African countries
> were also visited in late 1999.
>
> APTLD in 2000 visited two countries so far, and plan to visit 6 more
> countries
> with APNIC in 2000. The major issue to address in 2000 is ICANN
> participation
> through the at-large membership and others.
>
> Typical arrangement is for APTLD to pay the airfare, and the speaker to
> donate his time. The local arrangement is done by the local host.
> Asia-Pacific
> plan to visit as many countries in Asia-Pacific as possible to outreach
> in early days of ICANN.
>
> (3) Regional Meetings
>
> Many countries and regions are holding various meetings; workshops,
> tutorials,
> seminars, conferences and so on. This is true throughout all regions of
the
> world; North America, Latin America, Europe, Africa, and Asia-Pacific.
> Regional Internet organizations such as regional ccTLD groups, and
regional
> Internet registries(RIR) as well as national organizations play the major
> roles. Some cross fertilization is taking place such as exchanges of
> personnel and information materials such as among RIRs, between Asia and
> Africa, and between Asia and Europe.
>
> 4. Recommendation
>
> We are heading for 30,000 at-large members among 60 or more countries by
> July 2000, which is good starting point for outreach effort. The next
> phase needs good geographical diversity and cultural diversity as well as
> effort to retain the at-large members. We need to consider the following
> issues;
>
> (1) Regional offices
>
> It is important to have regional offices to have refined outreach. These
> may be based on the geographical regions and/or cultural/language regions.
> We may start from the exising regional organizations such as regional
ccTLD
> group secretariats, registrars and ISPs, and RIRs.
>
> (2) Seminar Tour
>
> The seminar tours initiated by APTLD may be expanded to other regions to
> have extensive outreach. Seminar materials may be shared and jointly
> developed if necessary.
>
> (3) Regional Meetings
>
> It is important to share the experience and information materials among
> regional and national meeting organizers, starting from listing the
> meetings.
> Know-how and technology trasnfer between regions and countries are also
> very important and effective.
>
> 5. Remarks
>
> Support to geographical and/or cultural regions where ICANN activities are
> not well informed such as Central and South Asia, Middle East, and some
> parts of Africa is urgently needed. This includes personnel support,
> funding support, and information material support.
>
>
>
****************************************************************************
> ***
>
> 2000.5.22
> 1. Title
>
> ICANN DNSO WG-E Global Outreach and Awareness
> Part 4: Awareness
>
> 2. Objective
>
> ICANN members need to be informed on current development at ICANN
> through meetings and written materials. There are two classes of
> ICANN members; 1000 ICANN meeting participants and the rest who do
> not participate ICANN meeting, typically due to financial reasons.
> Both classes of the members must be considered.
>
> 3. Case Studies
>
> There are two kinds of workshops and seminars; one held during ICANN
> Meeting, and the other held outside of ICANN Meeting. Some of the
> examples are
>
> (1) Berkman Center of Harvard on ICANN Workshop
>
> Berkman Center held several workshops on ICANN in 1998 and 1999. They
> were sponsored by ICANN. We expect Berkman Center to hold one workshop
> per year. We need to consider similar effort by other organizations
> when ICANN meeting is held outside of North America.
>
> Berkman Center also webcast all ICANN meetings in the past. It is well
> established by now with audio and text.
>
> (2) ccTLD Joint Workshop
>
> ccTLD constituency holds Joint TLD Workshop starting from June 1999.
> The workshop was self-supported with volunteer effort. We may consider
> to enhance the workshop with better funding and staffing.
>
> (3) Regional ccTLD Workshop
>
> APTLD in Asia-Pacific and CENTR in Europe hold workshops several times a
> year. They cover various topics. Other regions such as Latin America
> and Africa also hold workshops, but less often. We may consider cross
> fertilization among these workshop activities.
>
> (4) Harvard Internet Infrastructure Program
>
> Harvard Internet Infrastructure Program(HIIP) holds workshop once a year
> or twice on Internet and Society, and other topics.
>
> 4. Recommendation
>
> (1) We need to have good educational program at every ICANN meeting in its
> early stage. Berkman Center's workshop and Joint ccTLD Workshop are
> some of the notable examples. ICANN, together with its organizations
> may set up a committee to coordinate such effort.
>
> (2) Regional workshops, both regional and language-based, should be
> encouraged. Cross fertilization including knowhow and technology
> transfer
> should be encouraged. Personel exchange is one of the most effective
> schemes on this matter.
>
> (3) ICANN Meetings and workshops may be webcasted with more enhanced way
> for those who could not participate, i.e., all but 1000 members who
> could participate.
>
> (4) ICANN may consider to collaborate with some publishing houses to
> publish many of its activities. Many activities need good
documentation
> including good summary and introduction for good awareness program
> at the initial phase of ICANN activities.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
****************************************************************************
> ***